4.5 Article

Scleraxis Expression Is Coordinately Regulated in a Murine Model of Patellar Tendon Injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 289-296

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21220

关键词

Scleraxis; patellar tendon; mouse model

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis)
  2. Michael Foundation for Health Research
  3. Arthritis Society
  4. Providence Health Care
  5. James Hogg Research Centre, Heart and Lung Institute at St. Paul's Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the expression of Scleraxis in a murine model of patellar tendon injury in which the central third of the patellar tendon was unilaterally injured. The presence of tendon pathology was assessed using dual photon microscopy, conventional histology and microCT. Tendon pathology was also quantified noninvasively over a 12-week period using high-frequency ultrasound and laser Doppler flowmetry. Gene expression (Sex, Tnmd, and Col1a1) was determined at defined end-points (1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks) using qPCR on RNA from individual patellar tendons on injured and uninjured sides. There was significant development of tendon pathology as gauged by ultrasound and laser Doppler over 12 weeks. Injured tendons demonstrated significant histological and microCT evidence of pathological change, and disorganized collagen with reduced density. The expression of Sex and Col1a1 was unchanged at 1 week, significantly upregulated at 4 and 8 weeks, and had returned to baseline by 12 weeks. Tnmd expression was unchanged at 1 week, and significantly increased at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Patellar tendon injury was associated with marked increases in the expression of Sex, Tnmd, and Col1a1. Our data suggest new roles for Scleraxis in coordinating the response to injury in the pathogenesis of tendon disorders. (C) 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Orthop. Res. 29: 289-296, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据