4.5 Article

Titanium Particles Activate Toll-Like Receptor 4 Independently of Lipid Rafts in RAW264.7 Murine Macrophages

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 211-217

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21199

关键词

endotoxin; lipid rafts; toll-like receptors; asceptic loosening

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 AR43769, AR07505]
  2. Allen Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adherent pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PA.MPs) act through toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and TLR4 to increase the biological activity of orthopedic wear particles in cell culture and animal models of implant loosening. This study tested whether this is dependent on TLR association with lipid rafts as reported for the response to soluble TLR ligands. For this purpose, RAW264.7 murine macrophages were activated by exposure to titanium particles with adherent PAMPs, soluble lipopolysaccharide (LPS), soluble lipotecichoic acid (LTA), or heat-killed bacteria that had been extensively washed to remove soluble PAMPs. Lipid rafts were isolated by two independent methods and the location of TLE4 and TLR2 was analyzed by Western blotting. The cognate TLRs associated with lipid rafts when the macrophages were activated with soluble LPS and LTA but not after stimulation with either titanium particles with adherent PAMPs or heat-killed bacteria. The lipid raft disruptor, methyl-beta-cyclodextrin, dose-dependently inhibited TNF-alpha release in response to LPS but had no affect on TNF-alpha release in response to titanium particles with adherent PAMPs. We conclude, therefore, that titanium particles with adherent PAMPs and heat-killed bacteria activate TLR2 and TLR4 in macrophages without inducing either TLR to associate with lipid rafts. These results have important implications for the mechanisms of orthopedic implant loosening as well the mechanisms for TLR activation in other inflammatory situations. (C) 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Orthop. Res. 29: 211-217, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据