4.5 Article

Articular Cartilage Repair Using an Intra-Articular Magnet and Synovium-Derived Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 531-538

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21267

关键词

cell delivery system; magnet; synovium; intra-articular injection; cartilage repair

资金

  1. Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [21249079]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22500461, 21249079] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to investigate the chondrogenic potential of magnetically labeled synovium-derived cells (M-SDCs) and examine whether M-SDCs could repair the articular cartilage using an intra-articular magnet after delivery to the lesion. Synovium-derived cells (SDCs) were cultured from the synovium of a rat knee, and were magnetically labeled with ferumoxides. M-SDCs were examined with a transmission electron microscope. A pellet culture system was used to evaluate the chondrogenic potential of M-SDCs in a magnetic field. In a rat model, allogeneic M-SDCs were injected into the knee after we made an osteochondral defect on the patellar groove and implanted an intra-articular magnet at the bottom of the defect. We histologically examined the defects at 48 h, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks after treatment. Electron microscopy showed the transfection of ferumoxides into SDCs. The pellet cultures revealed the chondrogenic potential of M-SDCs in a magnetic field. M-SDCs accumulated in the osteochondral defect at 48 h after treatment, and we confirmed the regeneration of the articular cartilage at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks after treatment using an intra-articular magnet. We demonstrated that articular cartilage defects could be repaired using an intra-articular magnet and M-SDCs. We believe that this system will be useful to repair human articular cartilage defects. (C) 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29:531-538, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据