4.5 Article

Controlled Release of GDNF Reduces Nerve Root-Mediated Behavioral Hypersensitivity

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 120-127

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20710

关键词

radiculopathy; neurotrophic factor; GDNF; hydrogel; allodynia

资金

  1. NIH [AR047564]
  2. Sharpe and Ashton Foundations
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [K01AR047564] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nerve root compression produces persistent behavioral sensitivity in models of painful neck injury. This study utilized degradable poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels to deliver glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) to an injured nerve root. Hydrogels delivered similar to 98% of encapsulated GDNF over 7 days in an in vitro release assay without the presence of neurons and produced enhanced outgrowth of processes in cortical neural cell primary cultures. The efficacy of a GDNF hydrogel placed on the root immediately after injury was assessed in a rat pain model of C7 dorsal root compression. Control groups included painful injury followed by: (1) vehicle hydrogel treatment (no GDNF), (2) a bolus injection of GDNF, or (3) no treatment. After injury, mechanical allodynia (n = 6/group) was significantly decreased with GDNF delivered by the hydrogel compared to the three injury control groups (p < 0.03). The bolus GDNF treatment did not reduce allodynia at any time point. The GDNF receptor (GFR alpha-1) decreased in small, nociceptive neurons of the affected dorsal root ganglion, suggesting a decrease in receptor expression following injury. GDNF receptor immunoreactivity was significantly greater in these neurons following GDNF hydrogel treatment relative to GDNF bolustreated and untreated rats (p < 0.05). These data suggest efficacy for degradable hydrogel delivery of GDNF and Support this treatment approach for nerve root-mediated pain. (C) 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 27:120-127, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据