4.5 Article

Adaptive Patterns of Movement during Stair Climbing in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 325-329

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20751

关键词

knee loading; trunk motion; stair ascend; kinetics; kinematics

资金

  1. VA [A04-3583R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a distinctive characteristic in the pattern of movement (forward trunk lean to reduce demand on the quadriceps muscle) during stair climbing in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) that is associated with the severity of the disease. Twenty-three patients with radiographically diagnosed knee OA and 20 physically active adults performed stair ascending trials without support at their self-selected speed. Standard gait analysis was used to calculate three-dimensional lower extremity joint kinematics and kinetics. Forward trunk lean, or trunk flexion, was defined as the sagittal plane projection of the angle between a line connecting the midpoint of the trans-acromion line and the midpoint of the trans-iliac crest line and the global vertical axis. Patients with more severe knee OA (KL >= 3) had greater forward trunk lean (+6.3 degrees,p = 0.045) and lower knee net quadriceps moments (-35.2%,p = 0.001) than controls. In more severe patients, the forward trunk lean was correlated with a reduction in the net quadriceps moment during stair climbing (R-2 = 0.590,p = 0.006). The results of this study identified a distinctive compensatory pattern of movement to reduce the quadriceps demand during stair climbing in patients with more severe knee OA by increasing forward trunk lean. Assessing forward trunk lean during stair climbing may be a useful functional marker for evaluating osteoarthritis status and quadriceps function that appears to be a more sensitive indicator of disease severity than perceived pain. (C) 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 27:325-329, 2009

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据