4.5 Article

The Influence of Varying Hip Angle and Pelvis Position on Muscle Recruitment Patterns of the Hip Abductor Muscles During the Clam Exercise

期刊

出版社

J O S P T,
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4004

关键词

clam exercise; EMG; gluteus maximus; gluteus medius; tensor fasciae latae

向作者/读者索取更多资源

STUDY DESIGN: Within-subject, repeated-measures design. OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of pelvis position and hip angle on activation of the hip abductors while performing the clam exercise, BACKGROUND: Therapeutic exercises are regularly employed to strengthen the:hip abductors to improve lower-limb and pelvis stability. While previous studies primarily have compared the activity of hip abductor muscles between various exercises, few studies have examined the influence of varying the techniques of particular exercises on the relative activation of hip abductor muscles. Such information could be used to facilitate appropriate exercise instruction. METHODS: Muscle activation in 17 healthy, asymptomatic volunteers during 6 variations of the clam exercise was analyzed with surface electromyography. Electromyographic signals were recorded from the gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, and tensor fasciae latae. Normalized data were examined using 2-way, repeated-measures analyses of variance. RESULTS: The magnitude of gluteus maximus and gluteus medius activation was significantly greater when the pelvis was in neutral rather than reclined. Furthermore, gluteus medius activation was greatest when the hip was flexed to 60 degrees. Activation of the tensor fasciae latae was not influenced by pelvis position or hip angle. CONCLUSION: A neutral pelvis position is advocated to optimize recruitment of the gluteus maximus and gluteus medius during the clam exercise. Increasing the hip flexion angle increases activation of the gluteus medius. Tensor fasciae latae activity was relatively low and generally unaffected by variations of the clam exercise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据