4.5 Article

New organotin(IV) complexes of nicotinamide, isonicotinamide and some of their novel phosphoric triamide derivatives: Syntheses, spectroscopic study and crystal structures

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY
卷 695, 期 9, 页码 1383-1391

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2010.02.004

关键词

Organotin(IV); Phosphoramidate; Nicotinamide; Isonicotinamide; NMR spectroscopy; X-ray crystallography

资金

  1. Tarbiat Modarres University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three novel phosphoramidate ligands with formula RP(O)R-2', R = Nicotinamide(nia), R' = NHC(CH3)(3)(L-1), NH(C6H11)(L-2); R = isonicotinamide(iso), NH(C6H11) (L-3) and their new organotin(IV) complexes with formula SnCl2(CH3)(2)(X)(2), X = L-1 (C-1), L-2 (C-2), L-3 (C-3) plus SnCl2(CH3)(2)(L-4)(2)(C-4), L-4 = isoP(O)[NHC(CH3)(3)](2), were synthesized and characterized by H-1, C-13, P-31, Sn-119 NMR, IR, UV-Vis spectroscopy and elemental analysis. Two novel complexes of nia and iso with formula SnCl2(CH3)(2)(X)(2), X = nia (C-5), iso (C-6) were also prepared and all the complexes were spectroscopically studied in comparison to their related ligands and to each other. The crystal structure of complexes C-1, C-3, C-4, and C-5 were determined by X-ray crystallography. -Sn-Cl center dot center dot center dot H-N-major hydrogen bonds beside other electrostatic interactions produced a three dimensional polymeric cluster in the crystalline lattice of C-1, C-3, C-5 and a two dimensional polymeric chain in C-4. Results showed that coordination of the phosphoramidate ligand (L-4) to Sn in C-4 has been occurred from the nitrogen site of the pyridine ring similar to C-5, C-6 in which there is no P=O donor site; however, in C-1 and C-3 the active donor site of corresponding ligands is P=O. It seems that in these complexes there is a competition between P=O and N-pyridine donor sites and the influential factor which determines the winner site is the type of substituents on phosphorus atom. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据