4.7 Article

Developing Ligands for Palladium(II)-Catalyzed C-H Functionalization: Intimate Dialogue between Ligand and Substrate

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 78, 期 18, 页码 8927-8955

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jo400159y

关键词

-

资金

  1. TSRI
  2. NSF [CHE-1011898]
  3. NIH (NIGMS) [1 R01 GM084019-04, NIGMS 1 R01 GM102265-01]
  4. NSF under the CCI Center for Stereoselective C-H Functionalization [CHE-1205646]
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  6. Syngenta
  7. Novartis
  8. Pfizer
  9. Amgen
  10. Eli Lilly
  11. NSF GRFP
  12. NDSEG Fellowship program
  13. Skaggs-Oxford Scholarship program
  14. Division Of Chemistry
  15. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1011898, 1205646] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Homogeneous transition-metal-catalyzed reactions are indispensable to all facets of modern chemical synthesis. It is thus difficult to imagine that for much of the early 20th century, the reactivity and selectivity of all known homogeneous metal catalysts paled in comparison to their heterogeneous and biological counterparts. In the intervening decades, advances in ligand design bridged this divide, such that today some of the most demanding bond-forming events are mediated by ligand-supported homogeneous metal species. While ligand design has propelled many areas of homogeneous catalysis, in the field of Pd(II)-catalyzed C-H functionalization, suitable ligand scaffolds are lacking, which has hampered the development of broadly practical transformations based on C-H functionalization logic. In this Perspective, we offer an account of our research employing three ligand scaffolds, mono-N-protected amino acids, 2,6-disubstituted pyridines, and 2,2'-bipyridines, to address challenges posed by several synthetically versatile substrate classes. Drawing on this work, we discuss principles of ligand design, such as the need to match a ligand to a particular substrate class, and how ligand traits such as tunability and modularity can be advantageous in reaction discovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据