4.7 Article

Regiocomplementary Cycloaddition Reactions of Boryl- and Silylbenzynes with 1,3-Dipoles: Selective Synthesis of Benzo-Fused Azole Derivatives

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 78, 期 7, 页码 2965-2983

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jo302802b

关键词

-

资金

  1. global COE program from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (Japan)
  2. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  3. Hoansha foundation
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  5. [19890182]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25460018, 11J10892, 23790017, 25460157, 24590141, 22590039] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Benzo-fused nitrogen-containing heterocycles are abundant in biologically active compounds. One of the most important methods for preparing such heterocycles is the (3 + 2) cycloaddition reaction of benzynes with 1,3-dipolar compounds. However, the reactions of unsymmetrically substituted benzynes generally show low selectivity and hence yield mixtures of two regioisomers. In this paper, we describe the synthesis of both regioisomers of multisubstituted benzo-fused azole derivatives such as benzotriazoles, 1H-indazoles, and benzo[d]isoxazoles through the regiocomplementary (3 + 2) cycloaddition reactions of 3-boryl- and 3-silylbenzynes with 1,3-dipoles. The improved generation of 3-borylbenzynes from new precursors was one of the most important results of this work, which produced the successful (3 + 2) cycloaddition reactions with exclusive and proximal selectivities. On the other hand, similar reactions of 3-silylbenzynes selectively afforded distal cycloadducts. Analysis of the reaction pathways of these amazing regioselectivities by density functional theory calculations revealed that the (3 + 2) cycloadditions of borylbenzynes are controlled by the electrostatic effect of the boryl group, while those of silylbenzynes are controlled mainly by the steric effect of the bulky silyl groups that produced electrostatically unfavorable adducts via anomalous transition states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据