4.7 Article

Isomerically Pure Anthra[2,3-b:6,7-b′]-difuran (anti-ADF), -dithiophene (anti-ADT), and -diselenophene (anti-ADS): Selective Synthesis, Electronic Structures, and Application to Organic Field-Effect Transistors

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 77, 期 18, 页码 8099-8111

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jo301438t

关键词

-

资金

  1. MEXT, Japan [23245041]
  2. Founding Program for World-Leading R&D on Science and Technology (FIRST), Japan
  3. Japan Advanced Printed Electronics Technology Research Association (JAPERA), Japan
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23245041, 22750171] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new straightforward synthesis of isomerically pure anthra[2,3-b:6,7-b'] -difuran (anti-ADF), -dithiophene (anti-ADT), and -diselenophene (anti-ADS) from readily available 2,6-dimethoxyanthracene is described. The present successful synthesis makes it possible to overview the linear-shaped anti-acenedichalcogenophene compounds, that is, benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b']-, naphtho[2,3-b:6,7-b']-, and anthra[2,3-b:6,7-b']- difuran, -dithiophene, and -diselenophene. By comparing their electrochemical and photochemical properties, the electronic structures of acenedichalcogenophenes can be expressed as the outcome of balance between the central acene core and the outermost chalcogenophene rings. Among isomerically pure parent anti-anthradichalcogenophenes, anti-ADT and anti-ADS can afford crystalline thin films by vapor deposition, which acted as active layer in organic field-effect transistors with mobility as high as 0.3 cm(2) V-1 s(-1) for ADT and 0.7 cm(2) V-1 s(-1) for ADS. The mobility of isomerically pure anti-ADT is higher by several times than those reported for isomercally mixed ADT, implying that the isomeric purity could be beneficial for realizing the better FET mobility. We also tested the diphenyl derivatives of anti-ADF, -ADT, and -ADS as the active material for OFET devices, which showed high mobility of up to 1.3 cm(2) V-1 s(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据