4.7 Article

Synthesis and Biophysical Evaluation of 2′,4′-Constrained 2′O-Methoxyethyl and 2′4′-Constrained 2′O-Ethyl Nucleic Acid Analogues

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 75, 期 5, 页码 1569-1581

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jo902560f

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have recently shown that combining the structural elements of 2'O-methoxyethyl (MOE) and locked nuclecic acid (LNA) nucleosides yielded a series of nucleoside modification (cMOE, 2',4'-constrained MOE; cEt, 2',4'-constrained ethyl) that display improved potency over MOE and an improved therapeutic index relative to that of LNA antisense oligonucleotides. In this report we present details regarding the synthesis of the cMOE and cEt nucleoside phosphoramidites and the biophysical evaluation of oligonucleotides containing these nucleoside modification. The synthesis of the cMOE and eEt nucleoside phosphoramidites was efficiently accomplished starting from inexpensive commercially available diacetone allofuranose. The synthesis features the use of a seldom used 2-naphthylmethyl protecting group that provides crystalline intermediates during the synthesis and can be cleanly deprotected under mild conditions. The synthesis was greatly facilitated by the crystallinity of a key mono-TBDPS-protected diol intermediate. In the case of the cEt nucleosides, the introduction of the methyl group in either configuration was accomplished in a stereoselective manner. Ring closure of the 2'-hydroxyl group onto a secondary mesylate leaving group with clean inversion of stereochemistry was achieved under suprisingly mild conditions. For the S-cEt modification, the synthesis of all four (thymine, 5-methylcytosine, adenine, and guanine) nucleobase-modified phosphoramidites was accomplished on a multigram scale. Biophysical evaluation of the cMOE- and cEt-containing oligonucletides revealed that they possess hybridization and mismatch discrimination attributes similar to those of LNA but greatly improved resistance to exonuclease digestion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据