4.3 Article

Electromyogram biofeedback training for daytime clenching and its effect on sleep bruxism

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 83-89

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12233

关键词

awake bruxism; sleep bruxism; biofeedback; temporal muscle; electromyography; cognitive behavioural therapy

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [23390447]
  2. Meikai University Miyata Research Grant (E)
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23390447] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bruxism contributes to the development of temporomandibular disorders as well as causes dental problems. Although it is an important issue in clinical dentistry, no treatment approaches have been proven effective. This study aimed to use electromyogram (EMG) biofeedback (BF) training to improve awake bruxism (AB) and examine its effect on sleep bruxism (SB). Twelve male participants (mean age, 268 +/- 25years) with subjective symptoms of AB or a diagnosis of SB were randomly divided into BF (n=7) and control (CO, n=5) groups to undergo 5-h daytime and night-time EMG measurements for three consecutive weeks. EMG electrodes were placed over the temporalis muscle on the habitual masticatory side. Those in the BF group underwent BF training to remind them of the occurrence of undesirable clenching activity when excessive EMG activity of certain burst duration was generated in week 2. Then, EMGs were recorded at week 3 as the post-BF test. Those in the CO group underwent EMG measurement without any EMG BF training throughout the study period. Although the number of tonic EMG events did not show statistically significant differences among weeks 1-3 in the CO group, events in weeks 2 and 3 decreased significantly compared with those in week 1, both daytime and night-time, in the BF group (P<005, Scheffe's test). This study results suggest that EMG BF to improve AB tonic EMG events can also provide an effective approach to regulate SB tonic EMG events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据