4.3 Article

Effects of interocclusal distance on bite force and masseter EMG in healthy participants

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION
卷 40, 期 12, 页码 900-908

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12097

关键词

electromyography; interocclusal distance; masseter muscle; maximal voluntary occlusal force; trigeminal physiology

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24592894, 23592826] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate effects of interocclusal distance (IOD) on bite force and masseter electromyographic (EMG) activity during different isometric contraction tasks. Thirty-one healthy participants (14 women and 17 men, 212+/- 18years) were recruited. Maximal Voluntary Occlusal Bite Force (MVOBF) between the first molars and masseter EMG activity during all the isometric-biting tasks were measured. The participants were asked to bite at submaximal levels of 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% MVOBF with the use of visual feedback. The thickness of the force transducer was set at 8, 12, 16 and 20mm (= IOD), and sides were tested in random sequence. MVOBF was significantly higher at 8mm compared with all other IODs (P<0001). Only in women, IOD always had significant influence on the corresponding root-mean-square (RMS) value of EMG (P<0011). When biting was performed on the ipsilateral side to the dominant hand, the working side consistently showed higher masseter EMG activity compared with the balancing side (P<0020). On the contralateral side, there was no difference between the masseter EMG at any IODs. The results replicated the finding that higher occlusal forces can be generated between the first molars at shorter IODs. The new finding in this study was that an effect of hand dominance could be found on masseter muscle activity during isometric biting. This may suggest that there can be a general dominant side effect on human jaw muscles possibly reflecting differences in motor unit recruitment strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据