4.4 Article

The chemoadjuvant potential of grape seed procyanidins on p53-related cell death in oral cancer cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 322-331

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2011.01103.x

关键词

apoptosis; cell cycle; grape seed procyanidins; oral squamous cell carcinoma; p53

资金

  1. Tri-Service General Hospital [TSGH-C100-007-009-10-S02, TSGH-C100161, TSGH-C100-155, ND-I-29]
  2. Department of Dental Hygiene, China Medical University [CMU99-N1-04-1]
  3. National Science Council, Republic of China [NSC 99-2320-B-039-028-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: To clarify the efficacy of grape seed procyanidin (GSP) on antiproliferative effects related to p53 functional status of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) for its chemoadjuvant potential. METHODS: We used GSP to investigate SCC-25 cells with wild-type p53 gene and OEC-M1 cells with mutant p53 gene for the assessment of antiproliferative effects including cell viability, cell cycle, apoptosis, migration and invasion potential, and alterations of associated oncoproteins involved in cellular and molecular events. RESULTS: The findings suggest that GSP on OEC-M1 cells leads to cell cycle arrest by increasing the expression of p21(Cip1)/p27(Kip1) protein without functioning mitochondria-mediated apoptosis, whereas GSP on SCC-25 cells inhibits cell proliferation via both G1-phase arrest and mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner as a result of alterations of Bcl-2. GSP also inhibits the migration and invasion of both cells, which are associated with the suppression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), MMP-2 and MMP-9. CONCLUSION: Antiproliferative effectiveness of GSP is closely associated with the p53 status of OSCC cells. GSP displays chemoadjuvant potential via cell cycle blockage and apoptotic induction. Our findings clearly suggest that GSP may play a role as a novel chemopreventive or therapeutic agent for OSCC. J Oral Pathol Med (2012) 41: 322-331

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据