4.1 Article

Clinical Assessment of the Relationship Between the Third Molar and the inferior Alveolar Canal Using Panoramic Images and Computed Tomography

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 66, 期 11, 页码 2308-2313

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.042

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To predict the relationship between lower third molars and the inferior alveolar canal (IAC) from panoramic radiographs, and to establish criteria for using computed tomography (M). Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed involving 443 patients (695 teeth). Predictor variables were the distance between the third molar and the IAC, and findings according to the Rood's criteria. Outcome variables were the absence of cortication between the third molar and the IAC on the CT image, and injury of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). Statistical analysis was performed to assess the relationship between predictor and outcome variables. Results: All patients had preoperative panoramic radiographs, and 71 patients (119 teeth) also had CT images. On CT examination, 48 teeth (40.3%) showed absence of cortication. Injury of the IAN was reported in 7 cases (1.0%), 5 of which exhibited absence of cortication; the remaining 2 did not have CT scans. Five of the 48 cases showing absence of cortication exhibited IAN injury, and none of the cases with cortication exhibited IAN injury. On the panoramic images, the following signs were strongly correlated with absence of cortication: a superimposed relationship between the third molar and the IAC darkness of the root; and diversion and narrowing of the IAC. Conclusion: Presence of Rood's criteria was a predictor for a contact relationship between the third molar and the IAC, and an indication for CT examination. However, a superimposed relationship and the absence of Rood's criteria did not necessarily signify a separate relationship between third molar and the IAC. (C) 2008 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据