4.6 Article

Electronic couplings for molecular charge transfer: benchmarking CDFT, FODFT and FODFTB against high-level ab initio calculations. II

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 17, 期 22, 页码 14342-14354

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4cp04749d

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/J015571/1, EP/F067496, EP/L000202]
  2. IMPACT PhD studentship - University College London
  3. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)
  4. Landesgraduiertenforderung Baden-Wurttemberg
  5. Alexander v. Humboldt foundation
  6. state of Bavaria (grant solar technologies go hybrid)
  7. Royal Society for a University Research Fellowship
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J015571/1, EP/L000202/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. EPSRC [EP/L000202/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new database (HAB7-) of electronic coupling matrix elements (H-ab) for electron transfer in seven medium-sized negatively charged pi-conjugated organic dimers is introduced. Reference data are obtained with spin-component scaled approximate coupled cluster method (SCS-CC2) and large basis sets. Assessed DFT-based approaches include constrained density functional theory (CDFT), fragment-orbital DFT (FODFT), self-consistent charge density functional tight-binding (FODFTB) and the recently described analytic overlap method (AOM). This complements the previously reported HAB11 database where only cationic dimers were considered. The CDFT method in combination with a functional based on PBE and including 50% of exact exchange (HFX) was found to provide best estimates, with a mean relative unsigned error (MRUE) of 8.2%. CDFT couplings systematically increase with decreasing fraction of HFX as a consequence of increasing delocalisation of the SOMO orbital. The FODFT method is found to be very robust underestimating electronic couplings by 28%. The FODFTB and AOM methods, although orders of magnitude more efficient in terms of computational effort than the DFT approaches, perform well with reasonably small errors of 54% and 29%, respectively, translating in errors in the nonadiabatic electron transfer rate of a factor of 2.4 and 1.7, respectively. We discuss carefully various sources of errors and the scope and limitations of all assessed methods taking into account the results obtained for both HAB7- and HAB11 databases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据