4.2 Article

How Accurate are Self-Reports? Analysis of Self-Reported Health Care Utilization and Absence When Compared With Administrative Data

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181a86671

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL079546-04, R01 HL079546-03, 1 R01 HL079546-01, R01 HL079546-02, R01 HL079546-05, R01 HL079546-01, R01 HL079546] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine the accuracy of self-reported health care utilization and absence reported on health risk assessments against administrative claims and human resource records. Methods. Self-reported values of health care utilization and absenteeism were analyzed for concordance to administrative claims values. Percent agreement, Pearson's correlations, and multivariate logistic regression models examined the level of agreement and characteristics of participants with concordance. Results. Self-report and administrative data showed greater concordance for monthly compared with yearly health care utilization metrics. Percent agreement ranged from 30% to 99% with annual doctor visits having the lowest percent agreement. Younger people, males, those with higher education, and healthier individuals more accurately reported their health care utilization and absenteeism. Conclusions. Self-reported health care utilization and absenteeism may be used as a proxy when medical claims and administrative data are unavailable, particularly for shorter recall periods. (J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51:786-796)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据