4.1 Article

Base Camp Personnel Exposure to Particulate Matter During Wildland Fire Suppression Activities

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2011.652934

关键词

air quality; PM2.5; wildland fire

资金

  1. Missoula Technology and Development Center (Missoula, Mont.)
  2. U.S. Forest Service
  3. National Center for Research Resources

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wildland fire base camps commonly house thousands of support personnel for weeks at a time. The selection of the location of these base camps is largely a strategic decision that incorporates many factors, one of which is the potential impact of biomass smoke from the nearby fire event. Biomass smoke has many documented adverse health effects due, primarily, to high levels of fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Minimizing particulate matter exposure to potentially susceptible individuals working as support personnel in the base camp is vital. In addition to smoke from nearby wildland fires, base camp operations have the potential to generate particulate matter via vehicle emissions, dust, and generator use. We monitored particulate matter at three base camps during the fire season of 2009 in Washington. Oregon, and California. During the sampling events, 1-min time-weighted averages of PM2.5 and particle counts from three size fractions (0.3-0.5 microns, 0.5-1.0 microns, and 1.0-2.5 microns) were measured. Results showed that all PM size fractions (as well as overall PM2.5 concentrations) were higher during the overnight hours. a trend that was consistent at all camps. Our results provide evidence of camp-based, site-specific sources of PM2.5 that could potentially exceed the contributions from the nearby wildfire. These exposures could adversely impact wildland firefighters who sleep in the camp, as well as the camp support personnel, who could include susceptible individuals. A better understanding of the sources and patterns of poor air quality within base camps would help to inform prevention strategies to reduce personnel exposures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据