4.2 Article

Association between biomarkers of vitamin B12 status and the risk of neural tube defects

期刊

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 44, 期 10, 页码 1902-1908

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jog.13751

关键词

active vitamin B12; homocysteine; methyl malonic acid; neural tube defects; vitamin B12

资金

  1. National Research Centre
  2. Science & Technology Development Fund (STDF) project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between vitamin B12 and its biomarkers and the risk of neural tube defects. Methods: A total of 120 pregnant Egyptian women were included in the study. They were classified into two groups. Group A consisted of 50 women with neural tube defects in current pregnancy or with a history in previous pregnancies, and Group B consisted of 70 women with no history of neural tube defects in previous pregnancies or in the current pregnancy. All women were subjected to ultrasound anomaly scan and serum analysis of vitamin B12, homocysteine (Hcy), methyl malonic acid (MMA) and active vitamin B12 concentrations. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the best cut-off values of vitamin B12. Results: Serum levels of vitamin B12 were decreased in Neural tube defects (NTDs) cases compared to controls (2.736 vs 3.091 ng/mL; P=0.0015), while Hcy and MMA concentrations were elevated (18.39 vs 13.95 mu mol/L; P=0.0008 and 263 vs 229.7 mu mol/L; P=0.003, respectively). Active vitamin B12 reduction was not statistically significant (96.8 vs 99.36 pmol/L; P=0.8013). The optimal cut-off value of vitamin B12, 2.9 ng/mL, is the best threshold to expect neural tube defects, with a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 74.29%. Conclusion: Low vitamin B12 is a risk factor for having a fetus with neural tube defects. The monitoring of MMA and Hcy levels might be important in understanding and following cases with neural tube defects. Adding vitamin B12 to folic acid may help to decrease the incidence of neural tube defects in the Egyptian population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据