4.7 Article

Proposing a Caco-2/HepG2 cell model for in vitro iron absorption studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITIONAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 25, 期 7, 页码 710-715

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2014.02.013

关键词

Caco-2; HepG2; Hepcidin; Coculture; Intestinal; Cell model

资金

  1. Vastra Gotaland, Sweden [RUN612-470-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Caco-2 cell line is well established as an in vitro model for iron absorption. However, the model does not reflect the regulation of iron absorption by hepcidin produced in the liver. We aimed to develop the Caco-2 model by introducing human liver cells (HepG2) to Caco-2 cells. The Caco-2 and HepG2 epithelia were separated by a liquid compartment, which allowed for epithelial interaction. Ferritin levels in cocultured Caco-2 controls were 21.7 +/- 10.3 ng/mg protein compared to 7.7 +/- 5.8 ng/mg protein in monocultured Caco-2 cells. The iron transport across Caco-2 layers was increased when liver cells were present (8.1% +/- 1.5% compared to 3.5% +/- 2.5% at 120 mu M Fe). Caco-2 cells were exposed to 0, 80 and 120 mu M Fe and responded with increased hepcidin production at 1201 mu M Fe (3.6 +/- 0.3 ng/ml compared to 2.7 +/- 0.3 ng/ml). The expression of iron exporter ferroportin in Caco-2 cells was decreased at the hepcidin concentration of 3.6 ng/ml and undetectable at external addition of hepcidin (10 ng/ml). The apical transporter DMT1 was also undetectable at 10 ng/ml but was unchanged at the lower concentrations. In addition, we observed that sourdough bread, in comparison to heat-treated bread, increased the bioavailability of iron despite similar iron content (53% increase in ferritin formation, 97% increase in hepcidin release). This effect was not observed in monocultured Caco-2 cells. The Caco-2/HepG2 model provides an alternative approach to in vitro iron absorption studies in which the hepatic regulation of iron transport must be considered. (c) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据