4.7 Article

γ-Tocotrienol inhibits angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cell induced by cancer cell

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITIONAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 22, 期 12, 页码 1127-1136

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2010.09.012

关键词

gamma-Tocotrienol; Angiogenesis; HUVEC; Wnt signaling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81072296, 30872105]
  2. Creative Foundation of Ph.D. Students of Harbin Medical University, P.R. China [HCXB2010012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antiangiogenic therapy mediated by food components is an established strategy for cancer chemoprevention. Growth factors play critical roles in tumor angiogenesis. A conditioned medium containing growth factors from human gastric adenocarcinoma SGC-7901 cell conditioned medium was used as an angiogenic stimulus in this study. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inhibitory effect and possible mechanism of gamma-tocotrienol on tumor angiogenesis. The results showed that gamma-tocotrienol (10-40 mu mol/L) significantly suppressed proliferation, migration and tube formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) induced by SGC-7901 cell conditioned medium in a dose-dependent manner. gamma-Tocotrienol (800-1200 mu g/egg) also inhibited new blood vessel formation on the growing chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, the inhibitory effects of gamma-tocotrienol on HUVECs were correlated with inducing the apoptosis and arresting cell cycle at the G(0)/G(1) phase at a dose of 40 mu mol/L gamma-tocotrienol. In addition, gamma-tocotrienol inhibited angiogenesis in HUVECs by down-regulation of beta-catenin, cyclin D1, CD44, phospho-VEGFR-2 and MMP-9. The antiangiogenic effects of gamma-tocotrienol on HUVECs may be attributable to regulation of Wnt signaling by decreasing beta-catenin expression. Thus, our results suggest that gamma-tocotrienol has a potential chemopreventive agent via antiangiogenesis. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据