4.7 Article

Presence of low-grade inflammation impaired postprandial stimulation of muscle protein synthesis in old rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITIONAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 325-331

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2009.01.005

关键词

Aging; Muscle; Protein synthesis; Nutrition; Low-grade inflammation; Rat

资金

  1. French Ministry of Research [UNH1019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aging is characterized by a decline in muscle mass that could be explained by a defect in the regulation of postprandial muscle protein metabolism. This study was undertaken to examine a possible link between the development of low-grade inflammation (LGI) in elderly and the resistance of muscle protein synthesis and degradation pathways to food intake. Fifty-five 20-month-old-rats were studied for 5 months; blood was withdrawn once a month to assess plasma fibrinogen and alpha 2-macroglobulin. Animals were then separated into two groups at 25 months old according to their inflammation status: a control non-inflamed (NI, n=24) and a low-grade inflamed group (LGI, n=23). The day of the experiment, rats received no food or a meal. Muscle protein synthesis was assessed in vivo using the flooding dose method ([1-C-13]phenylalanine) and muscle phosphorylation of protein S6 kinase, and protein S6 was measured in gastrocnemius muscle. Muscle proteolysis was assessed in vitro using the epitrachlearis muscle. Postabsorptive muscle protein synthesis and proteolysis were similar in NI and LGI. After food intake, muscle protein synthesis was significantly stimulated in NI but remained unresponsive in LGI. Muscle proteolysis was similar in both groups whatever the inflammation and/or the nutritional status. In conclusion. we showed that development of LGI during aging may be responsible, at least in part, for the defect in muscle protein synthesis stimulation induced by food intake in rats. Our results suggested that the control of LGI development in elderly improve meal effect on muscle protein synthesis and consequently slow down sarcopenia. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据