4.7 Article

Dietary supplementation with selenomethylselenocysteine produces a differential proteomic response

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITIONAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 20, 期 10, 页码 791-799

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2008.07.008

关键词

Chemoprotective selenium form; Plasma proteome; Nutriproteomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic forms of selenium offer important health benefits including cancer prevention. Selenium intake has been traditionally quantified as glutathioneperoxidase activity or selenium concentration in blood or tissues. However, these indexes do not reflect organic selenium intake. Effect of dietary supplementation of rats with selenomethylselenocysteine on the blood plasma proteome was investigated in order to detect protein abundance differences between experimental (supranutritional selenium supplementation) and control [minimum selenium dose and sodium selenate instead of selenomethylselenocysteine (SeMSeCys)] groups. Four experimental groups and six control groups consisting of six rats each were fed with base diet supplemented with SeMSeCys or sodium selenate in different concentrations for different periods of time. A proteomic approach, comprising two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry, was used to assess protein abundance in blood plasma. Statistically significant differences in the abundance of some proteins were detected in all the experimental groups. Four proteins were found to increase their abundance in response to the experimental conditions: apolipoprotein E, haptoglobin and alpha-1-antitrypsin abundance was related to the extent of supplementation period and transthyretin in response to SeMSeCys dose. Apolipoprotein E and transthyretin were not differentially expressed when diets were supplemented with sodium selenate instead of SeMSeCys. We postulate that these proteins are potential biomarkers of chemoprotective selenium intake. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据