4.6 Article

Plasma vitamin d levels and cognitive function in aging women: The nurses' health study

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 400-406

出版社

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s12603-013-0409-9

关键词

Vitamin D; cognitive function; women's health

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [P01 CA87969, R01 CA49449]
  2. National Institute on Aging [R01AG020727]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vitamin D may play a role in preserving cognitive function. However, there is a paucity of prospective studies on the relationship between vitamin D and cognition with aging. The aim of this study was to examine the association between plasma levels of vitamin D and subsequent cognitive function. This is a prospective study including 1,185 women aged 60-70 years from the Nurses' Health Study, who had plasma 25-hydroxy-vitamin D levels measured in 1989-1990 and completed an initial Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status approximately 9 years later. Subsequently, three follow-up cognitive assessments were conducted at 1.5-2.0 years intervals. We used multivariable-adjusted linear regression to model initial cognitive function, and mixed linear regression to model change in cognitive function over time. Lower vitamin D levels were associated with significantly worse cognitive function 9 years later. For example, the mean global composite score averaging all the cognitive tests was 0.20 lower (95% Confidence Interval (CI):-0.33,-0.08; p-trend=0.009) in women in the lowest quintile (median=14.1 ng/mL) compared with women in the highest quintile of vitamin D (median=38.4 ng/mL). The observed differences were equivalent to the effect estimates we found for women who were approximately 4-6 years apart in age. However, vitamin D levels were not significantly associated with subsequent cognitive decline during 6 years of follow-up. Higher levels of plasma vitamin D in women aged 60-70 years were associated with better cognitive function about a decade later but were not associated with cognitive decline during 6 years of follow-up.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据