4.1 Article

Impact of Cooking and Home Food Preparation Interventions Among Adults: Outcomes and Implications for Future Programs

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR
卷 46, 期 4, 页码 259-276

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.02.001

关键词

cooking; food preparation; intervention; diet outcomes; review

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [K07CA126837]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Cooking programs are growing in popularity; however, an extensive review has not examined their overall impact. Therefore, this study reviewed previous research on cooking/home food preparation interventions and diet and health-related outcomes among adults and identified implications for practice and research. Design: Literature review and descriptive summative method. Main Outcome Measures: Dietary intake, knowledge/skills, cooking attitudes and self-efficacy/confidence, health outcomes. Analysis: Articles evaluating the effectiveness of interventions that included cooking/home food preparation as the primary aim (January, 1980 through December, 2011) were identified via Ovid MEDLINE, Agricola, and Web of Science databases. Studies grouped according to design and outcomes were reviewed for validity using an established coding system. Results were summarized for several outcome categories. Results: Of 28 studies identified, 12 included a control group with 6 as nonrandomized and 6 as randomized controlled trials. Evaluation was done postintervention for 5 studies, pre- and postintervention for 23, and beyond postintervention for 15. Qualitative and quantitative measures suggested a positive influence on main outcomes. However, nonrigorous study designs, varying study populations, and the use of nonvalidated assessment tools limited stronger conclusions. Conclusions and Implications: Well-designed studies are needed that rigorously evaluate long-term impact on cooking behavior, dietary intake, obesity and other health outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据