4.1 Article

Nutrient intake and nutritional status indicators of participant and nonparticipant pupills of a parent-supported school lunch program in Kenya

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR
卷 40, 期 5, 页码 298-304

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2008.04.353

关键词

school lunch program; pupils; nutritional status indicators; food and nutrient intake; Emuhaya District; Kenya

资金

  1. Maseno University School of Public Health and Community Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To compare nutrient intake and indicators of nutritional status of western Kenyan pupil participants and nonparticipants of a parent-supported school lunch program. Design: Pupils and their caregivers were interviewed to assess their 24-hour dietary intake and the socioeconomic status of the family. Pupils' weights and heights were measured. Setting: Eight randomly selected schools with parent-supported school lunch programs in Emuhaya, western Kenya. Participants: 320 pupils aged between 10 and 12 years in Standard 5 and Standard 6 were disaggregated into school lunch participants (n = 160) and nonparticipants (n = 160). Main Outcome Measures: Pupils' energy and protein intake; nutritional status indicators; household socioeconomic characteristics. Analysis: Independent t test for comparison of group means; chi-square for socioeconomic characteristics. Level of significance was P = .05. Results: Energy and protein consumption of participants was higher than that of the nonparticipants. Severe underweight, severe Stunting, and severe wasting were significantly higher among the nonparticipants. Hunger and a higher absenteeism rate from school were more commonly reported among the nonparticipants. Conclusions and Implications: This study demonstrates the interaction of poverty, nutrition status, and education. To improve the nutritional status and academic performance of the students whose parents cannot afford to participate in school lunch programs, funding from external sources is essential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据