4.1 Article

Educational intervention to modify bottle-feeding behaviors among formula-feeding mothers in the WIC program: Impact on infant formula intake and weight gain

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR
卷 40, 期 4, 页码 244-250

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2007.01.002

关键词

infant nutrition; formula-feeding; WIC; formula intake; education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Formula-fed infants gain weight faster than breastfed infants. This study evaluated whether encouraging formula-feeding caregivers to be sensitive to infant satiety cues would alter feeding practices and reduce infant formula intake and weight gain. Design: Double-blind, randomized educational intervention, with intake and growth. measured before (at I to 2 months) and after (4 to 5 months) the intervention. Setting: Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) clinics in Sacramento, California. Participants: 836 caregivers of young infants were screened; 214 were eligible, and 104 agreed to participate. Intervention: Intervention subjects received education promoting awareness of satiety cues and discouraging bottles containing more than 6 ounces before 4 months of age; intervention and control groups received education regarding introduction and feeding of solid food after 4 months of age. Main Outcome Measures: Formula intake (mL/24 hours) and weight gain (g/week). Analysis: Differences between groups evaluated using 2-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Results: Sixty-one subjects completed baseline records, 44 attended class, and 38 completed the study. Despite a positive response to the educational intervention, there was no change in bottle-feeding behaviors (formula intake at 4 to 5 months was more than 1100 mL/day in both groups). Infant growth in the intervention group was greater than in the control group (P <.01), contrary to the hypothesis. Conclusions and implications: The intervention improved knowledge of the key messages, but further research is needed to understand barriers to modifying bottle-feeding behaviors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据