4.6 Article

Scripted Messages Delivered by Nurses and Radio Changed Beliefs, Attitudes, Intentions, and Behaviors Regarding Infant and Young Child Feeding in Mexico

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 143, 期 6, 页码 915-922

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/jn.112.169235

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scalable interventions are needed to improve infant and young child feeding (IYCF). We evaluated whether an IYCF nutrition communication strategy using radio and nurses changed beliefs, attitudes, social norms, intentions, and behaviors related to breastfeeding (BF), dietary diversity, and food consistency. Women with children 6-24 mo were randomly selected from 6 semi-urban, low-income communities in the Mexican state of Morelos (intervention, n = 266) and from 3 comparable communities in Puebla (control, n = 201). Nurses delivered only once 5 scripted messages: BF, food consistency, flesh-food and vegetable consumption, and feed again if food was rejected; these same messages aired 7 times each day on 3 radio stations for 21 d. The control communities were not exposed to scripted messages via nurse and radio. We used a pre-/post-test design to evaluate changes in beliefs, attitudes, norms, and intentions as well as change in behavior with 7-d food frequency questions. Mixed models were used to examine intervention-control differences in pre-/post changes. Coverage was 87% for the nurse component and 34% for radio. Beliefs, attitudes, and intention, but not social norms, about IYCF significantly improved in the intervention communities compared with control. Significant pre-/post changes in the intervention communities compared with control were reported for BE frequency (3.7 +/- 0.6 times/d), and consumption of vegetables (0.6 +/- 0.2 d) and beef (0.2 +/- 0.1 d) and thicker consistency of chicken (0.6 +/- 0.2 d) and vegetable broths (0.8 +/- 0.4 d). This study provides evidence that a targeted communication strategy using a scalable model significantly improves IYCF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据