4.6 Article

High Prevalence of Vitamin A Deficiency Is Detected by the Modified Relative Dose-Response Test in Six-Month-Old Senegalese Breast-Fed Infants

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 142, 期 11, 页码 1991-1996

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/jn.112.166454

关键词

-

资金

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency TC project [SEN60/16]
  2. University of Dakar-Senegal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To alleviate vitamin A (VA) deficiency (VAD) in Senegal, understanding the relationship between VA status of lactating women and their 6-mo-old infants is important. This study measured 6-mo-old infants' VA intake from human milk and assessed the VA status of mothers and infants. A comprehensive study was undertaken in 34 mother-infant pairs. Nonpregnant lactating women and their infants were included. None of the infants had received a VA supplement. Mothers were grouped as supplemented with 2 doses of 200,000 IU (60,000 mu g; 210 mu mol) retinol as retinyl palmitate (n = 13) or nonsupplemented In = 191 after delivery. Breast milk intake was measured by the deuterium dilution technique. Plasma and breast milk retinol concentrations were measured by HPLC. Infants' VA liver stores were assessed by the modified relative dose-response (MRDR) test. Plasma retinol detected 15% VAD among infants and the MRDR test (>= 0.06) indicated 73.5% with low VA liver stores. Infants' milk VA intakes were close to estimated requirements (375 mu g/d). No correlation was found between infants' plasma retinol and MRDR value. Infants' MRDR value was lower in the group from supplemented mothers (0.055 +/- 0.017 vs. 0.073 +/- 0.017; P = 0.009), but no difference was observed between plasma retinol concentrations of both groups of mothers; 8.8% of mothers were VA deficient based on plasma retinol (<= 0.7 mu mol/L). Low VA liver stores were prevalent among Senegalese infants at the beginning of the complementary feeding period. Postpartum VA-supplemented mothers significantly enhanced their infants' VA liver stores. J. Nutr. 142: 1991-1996, 2012.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据