4.6 Article

Early Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation of Mothers during Lactation Leads to High Plasma Concentrations in Very Preterm Infants

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 141, 期 2, 页码 231-236

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/jn.110.125880

关键词

-

资金

  1. SickKids Foundation [CAM06.322]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MTP85228]
  3. Fonds de la Recherche en Sante du Quebec

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Very preterm infants are vulnerable to deficiency in DHA. In a longitudinal study, 10 mothers who delivered <= 29 wk gestation and planned to breast-feed received DHA (1200 mg/d) until 36 wk after conception. The plasma DHA status was assessed in their 12 infants (including 2 pairs of twins) from birth to d 49. Fatty acid profiles were measured weekly in breast milk, and in plasma of mothers and infants at baseline and at d15 and 49. Plasma and breast milk fatty acid concentrations in the DHA-supplemented group at d 49 were compared with a reference group of very preterm infants (n = 24, including triplets) whose mothers In = 22) did not receive DHA during lactation. The infants' plasma DHA concentration tended to be greater in the DHA group than in the reference group (P = 0.10) and was greater when expressed as a percentage of total fatty acids (P = 0.009). At d 49, maternal milk DHA in the DHA group (1.92 +/- 1.10 mmol/L) was similar to 12 times higher than in the reference group (0.15 +/- 0.27 mmol/L) (P < 0.001). The amount of DHA provided to the infants increased from wk 1 through wk 7 in the DHA group (P < 0.001). Although enteral intake at wk 7 did not differ between the DHA group [119 +/- 51 mL/(kgd)] and the reference group [113 +/- 66 mL/(kg.d)], DHA group infants received 55 +/- 38 mg/(kg.d) of DHA, and the reference group infants received 7 +/- 11 mg/(kg.d) (P < 0.001). Early supplementation with DHA to lactating mothers with low dietary DHA intake successfully increased the plasma DHA status in very preterm infants. J. Nutr. 141: 231-236, 2011.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据