4.6 Article

A Two-Step Association Study Identifies CAV2 rs2270188 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Interaction with Fat Intake in Type 2 Diabetes Risk

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 141, 期 2, 页码 177-181

出版社

AMER SOC NUTRITION-ASN
DOI: 10.3945/jn.110.124206

关键词

-

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Science, Germany [01 EA 9401]
  2. European Union [SOC 95201408 05E02, SOC 98200769 05F02]
  3. German Cancer Aid [70-2488-Ha I]
  4. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [AZ 0313437B/D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple genetic and environmental factors underlie the etiology of type 2 diabetes. To evaluate the influence of the relationship between dietary fat intake and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in fat assimilation on disease susceptibility, a 2-step approach using an exploratory case-control study (n = 192/384) and an independent, confirmatory case-cohort study (n = 614/2248) taken from the same prospective study population (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Potsdam) was used. Sixty-three SNPs in 32 genes were initially analyzed. Total intake of fat and fatty acid intake were calculated from validated baseline FFQ. The SNP x nutrient interaction was tested in multivariate adjusted regression models. The initial screening step revealed evidence that, for 4 SNPs (CAV2 rs2270188, DBI rs2084202, PPARG rs1801282, and SREBF1 rs2297508), disease susceptibility might depend on the amount and quality of fat intake. The insulin receptor regulator CAV2 rs2270188 G > T SNP was found to interact with dietary fat in the confirmatory case-cohort study. Using pooled data, homozygous individuals of the rare T-allele showed a 100% greater risk of type 2 diabetes if daily fat intake was increased from 30 to 40 % energy. An increase in dietary SFA from 10 to 20 % energy predicted an similar to 200% greater risk of type 2 diabetes. We found preliminary evidence that CAV2 rs2270188 interacts with dietary fat to affect risk of type 2 diabetes. J. Nutr. 141: 177-181, 2011.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据