4.6 Article

Leucine Supplementation of a Low-Protein Meal Increases Skeletal Muscle and Visceral Tissue Protein Synthesis in Neonatal Pigs by Stimulating mTOR-Dependent Translation Initiation

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 140, 期 12, 页码 2145-2152

出版社

AMER SOC NUTRITION-ASN
DOI: 10.3945/jn.110.128421

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 AR44474, KO8 AR051563]
  2. USDA [58-6250-6-001]
  3. Ajinomoto Co Inc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein synthesis and eukaryotic initiation factor (elF) activation are increased in skeletal muscle of neonatal pigs parenterally infused with amino acids Leucine appears to be the most effective single amino acid to trigger these effects To examine the response to enteral leucine supplementation overnight food deprived 5-d-old pigs were gavage fed at 0 and 60 min a 1) low-protein diet (LP) 2) LP supplemented with leucine (LP+L) to equal leucine in the high-protein diet (HP) or 3) HP diet Diets were isocaloric and equal in lactose Fractional protein synthesis rates and translation initiation control mechanisms were examined in skeletal muscles and visceral tissues 90 min after feeding Protein synthesis rates in longissimus dorsi gastrocnemius and masseter muscles heart jejunum kidney and pancreas but not liver were greater in the LP+L group compared with the LP group and did not differ from the HP group Feeding LP+L and HP diets compared with the LP diet increased phosphorylation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) 4E-binding protein 1, ribosomal protein S6 kinase-1 and elF4G and formation of the active elF4E elF4G complex in longissimus dorsi muscle In all tissues except liver activation of mTOR effectors increased in pigs fed LP+L and HP vs LP diets Our results suggest that leucine supplementation of a low-protein meal stimulates protein synthesis in muscle and most visceral tissues to a rate similar to that achieved by feeding a high-protein meal and this stimulation involves activation of mTOR downstream effectors J Nutr 140 2145-2152 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据