4.6 Article

A Micronutrient Powder with Low Doses of Highly Absorbable Iron and Zinc Reduces Iron and Zinc Deficiency and Improves Weight-For-Age Z-Scores in South African Children

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 141, 期 2, 页码 237-242

出版社

AMER SOC NUTRITION-ASN
DOI: 10.3945/jn.110.129247

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundation Nutrition Industry, Basel, Switzerland
  2. Medical Research Council, Parow, South Africa
  3. North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
  4. ETH, Zurich, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Micronutrient powders (MNP) are often added to complementary foods high in inhibitors of iron and zinc absorption. Most MNP therefore include high amounts of iron and zinc, but it is no longer recommended in malarial areas to use untargeted MNP that contain the Reference Nutrient Intake for iron in a single serving. The aim was to test the efficacy of a low-iron and -zinc (each 2.5 mg) MNP containing iron as NaFeEDTA, ascorbic acid (AA), and an exogenous phytase active at gut pH. In a double-blind controlled trial, South African school children with low iron status (n = 200) were randomized to receive either the MNP or the unfortified carrier added just before consumption to a high-phytate maize porridge 5 d/wk for 23 wk; primary outcomes were iron and zinc status and a secondary outcome was somatic growth. Compared with the control, the MNP increased serum ferritin (P<0.05), body iron stores (P<0.01) and weight-for-age Z-scores (P<0.05) and decreased transferrin receptor (P<0.05). The prevalence of iron deficiency fell by 30.6% (P<0.01) and the prevalence of zinc deficiency decreased by 11.8% (P<0.05). Absorption of iron from the MNP was estimated to be 7-8%. Inclusion of an exogenous phytase combined with NaFeEDTA and AA may allow a substantial reduction in the iron dose from existing MNP while still delivering adequate iron and zinc. In addition, the MNP is likely to enhance absorption of the high native iron content of complementary foods based on cereals and/or legumes. J. Nutr. 141: 237-242, 2011.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据