4.6 Article

Iron Transporters Are Differentially Regulated by Dietary Iron, and Modifications Are Associated with Changes in Manganese Metabolism in Young Pigs

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 139, 期 8, 页码 1474-1479

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/jn.109.105866

关键词

-

资金

  1. North Carolina Pork Council
  2. Potash Corp.
  3. North Carolina Agricultural Research Service

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the effects of dietary iron (Fe) on manganese (Mn) metabolism, 24 weaned pigs (21 d old) were blocked by litter and weight and randomly assigned to the following treatments: 1) no supplemental Fe [low Fe (L-Fe)]; 2) 100 mg supplemental Fe/kg [adequate Fe (A-Fe)]; and 3) 500 mg supplemental Fe/kg [high Fe (H-Fe)]. The basal diet was analyzed to contain 20 mg Fe/kg. Tissues were harvested after 32 d of feeding. Daily gain (least square means +/- SEM) was greater in A-Fe pigs (328.3 +/- 29.9 g/d) than in L-Fe pigs (224.0 +/- 11.2 g/d). Hemoglobin concentrations on d 32 were lower in L-Fe pigs (62 +/- 3.5 g/L) than in A-Fe pigs (128 +/- 5.6 g/L) and did not differ between pigs fed A-Fe and H-Fe (133 +/- 12.0 g/L). Liver Fe increased with increasing dietary Fe. Relative hepatic hepcidin expression was greater in pigs fed A-Fe and H-Fe than in those fed L-Fe. Relative expressions of duodenal divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1) and solute carrier family 39 member 14 (ZIP14) were increased in L-Fe pigs compared with H-Fe pigs. Liver copper (Cu) was higher in L-Fe (0.56 +/- 0.04 mmol/kg) and H-Fe (0.58 +/- 0.04 mmol/kg) pigs than in A-Fe pigs (0.40 +/- 0.04 mmol/kg). Liver Min was lower in H-Fe pigs (0.15 +/- 0.01 mmol/kg) than in A-Fe (0.23 +/- 0.02 mmol/kg) or L-Fe pigs (0.20 +/- 0.02 mmol/kg). Duodenal Mn concentrations were greater in L-Fe pigs than in A-Fe or H-Fe pigs. Fe deficiency in pigs increased gene expression of duodenal metal transporters (DMT1 and ZIP14) and supplementation with H-Fe reduced expression of DMT1 and ZIP14, which may have decreased absorption of Mn. J. Nutr. 139: 1474-1479, 2009.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据