4.6 Article

Mathematical Modeling of Serum 13C-Retinol in Captive Rhesus Monkeys Provides New Insights on Hypervitaminosis A

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 139, 期 10, 页码 2000-2006

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/jn.109.111922

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIHNIDDK61973
  2. Wisconsin National Primate Research Center [5P51RR000167]
  3. [RR15459-01]
  4. [RR020141-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypervitaminosis A is increasingly a public health concern, and thus noninvasive quantitative methods merit exploration. In this study, we applied the C-13-retinol isotope dilution test to a nonhuman primate model with excessive liver stores. After baseline serum chemistries, rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta; n = 16) were administered 3.5 mu mol C-13(2)-retinyl acetate. Blood was drawn at baseline, 5 h, and 2, 4, 7, 14, 21, and 28 d following the dose. Liver biopsies were collected 7 d before and 2 d after dosing (n = 4) and at 7, 14, and 28 d (n = 4/time) after dosing. Serum and liver were analyzed by HPLC and GC-combustion-isotope ratio MS for retinol and its enrichment, respectively. Model-based compartmental analysis was applied to serum data. Lactate dehydrogenase was elevated in 50% of the monkeys. Total body reserves (TBR) of vitamin A (VA) were calculated at 28 d. Predicted TBR (3.52 +/- 2.01 mmol VA) represented measured liver stores (4.56 +/- 1.38 mmol VA; P = 0.124). Predicted liver VA concentrations (13.3 +/- 9.7 mu mol/g) were similar to measured liver VA concentrations (16.4 +/- 5.3 mu mol/g). The kinetic models predict that 27-52% of extravascular VA is exchanging with serum in hypervitaminotic A monkeys. The test correctly diagnosed hypervitaminosis A in all monkeys, i.e. 100% sensitivity. Stable isotope techniques have important public health potential for the classification of VA status, including hypervitaminosis, because no other technique besides invasive liver biopsies, correctly identifies excessive liver VA stores. J. Nutr. 139: 2000-2006, 2009.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据