4.6 Article

Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cells absorb soybean ferritin by μ2 (AP2)-dependent endocytosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 138, 期 4, 页码 659-666

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jn/138.4.659

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK20251, R01 DK020251, R01 DK020251-29, R56 DK020251] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iron deficiency, a condition currently affecting similar to 3 billion people, persists in the 21st century despite half a millennium of medical treatment. Soybean ferritin (SBFn), a large, stable protein nanocage around a mineral with hundreds of iron and oxygen atoms, is a source of nutritional iron with an unknown mechanism for intestinal absorption. Iron absorption from SBFn is insensitive to phytate, suggesting an absorption mechanism different from for the ferrous transport. Here, we investigated the mechanism of iron absorption from mineralized SBFn using Caco-2 cells (polarized in bicameral inserts) as an intestinal cell mode and analyzed binding, internalization and degradation with labeled SBFn (I-131 or fluorescent labels), confocal microscopy, and immunoanalyses to show: 1) saturable binding to the apical cell surface; dissociation constant of 7.75 +/- 0.88 nmol/L; 2) internalization of SBFn that was dependent on temperature, concentration, and time; 3) entrance of SBFn iron into the labile iron pool (calcein quenching); 4) degradation of the SBFn protein cage; and 5) assembly peptide 2 (AP2)-/clathrin-dependent endocytosis (sensitivity of SBFn uptake to hyperosmolarity, acidity, and RNA interference to the mu(2) subunit of AP2), and resistance to filipin, a caveolar endocytosis inhibitor. The results support a model of SBFn endocytosis through the apical cell membrane, followed by protein cage degradation, mineral reduction/dissolution, and iron entry to the cytosolic iron pool. The large number of iron atoms in SBFn makes iron transport across the cell membrane a much more efficient event for SBFn than for single iron atoms as heme or ferrous ions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据