4.6 Article

Daily quercetin supplementation dose-dependently increases plasma quercetin concentrations in healthy humans

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 138, 期 9, 页码 1615-1621

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1093/jn/138.9.1615

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our aim was to investigate the effects of an oral supplementation of quercetin at 3 different doses on plasma concentrations of quercetin, parameters of oxidant/antioxidart status, inflammation, and metabolism. To this end, 35 healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to take 50, 100, or 150 mg/d (group 050-Q150) quercetin for 2 wk. Fasting blood samples were collected at the beginning and end of the supplementation period. Compared with baseline, quercetin supplementation significantly increased plasma concentrations of quercetin by 178% (Q50), 359% (Q100), and 570% (Q150: P< 0.01 for all). High interindividual variation was found for plasma quercetin concentrations (36-57%). Quercetin did not affect concentrations of serum uric acid or plasma alpha- and gamma-tocopherols, oxidized LDL, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, or plasma antioxidative capacity as assessed by the ferric-reducing antioxidant potential and oxygen radical absorbance capacity assays. In addition, serum lipids and lipoproteins, body composition, and resting energy expenditure did not significantly change during quercetin supplementation. Pharmacokinetics of quercetin were investigated in a subgroup of 15 volunteers. The areas under the plasma concentration-time curves ranged from 76.1 mu mol.min.L-1 to 305.8 mu mol.min.L-1 (50- and 150-mg dosages, respectively). Median maximum plasma concentrations of quercetin (431 nmol/L) were observed 360 min after intake of 150 ring quercetin. In conclusion, daily supplementation of healthy humans with graded concentrations of quercetin for 2 wk dose-dependently increased plasma quercetin concentrations but did not affect antioxidant status, oxidized LDL, inflammation, or metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据