4.6 Article

Tocotrienol Inhibits Secretion of Angiogenic Factors from Human Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Cells by Suppressing Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 138, 期 11, 页码 2136-2142

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/jn.108.093237

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Agircultural and Biological Research Organization, Japan
  2. M Co. Ltd (Sandal, Japan)
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20228002] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tocotrienol (T3), unsaturated vitamin E, has recently gained considerable attention as a potent antiangiogenic agent minimizing tumor growth, the exact intracellular mechanisms of which remain poorly understood. Because hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha: (HIF-1 alpha), its downstream target vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and other angiogenic factors such as interleukin-8 (IL-8) and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) play critical roles in neovascularization, we tested the hypothesis that the inhibitory effect of T3 on tumor argiogenesis is via regulation of these angiogenic factors. We used 2 cancer cell lines, human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells (DLD-1) and human hepatoma cells (HepG2). T3 isomers (2 mu mol/L) inhibited hypoxia-induced VEGF secretion from DLD-1, with delta-T3 showing potent inhibition. delta-T3 suppressed hypoxia-induced VEGF and IL-8 expression in DLD-1 at both mRNA and protein levels, and we found the inhibitory mechanism of delta-T3 by reducing HIF-1 alpha protein expression or increasing HIF-1 alpha degradation. Also, delta-T3 (2 mu mol/L) did not affect hypoxia-induced COX-2 mRNA expression; however, delta-T3 tended to suppress (P = 0.044) hypoxia-induced COX-2 protein expression, implying a possible post-transcriptional mechanism by delta-T3. Overall, our results confirmed that T3 has an inhibitory effect on angiogenic factor secretion from cancer cells and revealed the possible mechanisms, providing new information about the antiangiogenic effects of T3. J. Nutr. 138: 2136-2142, 2008.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据