3.9 Article

DNA Methylation Changes Induced by a High-Fat Diet and Fish Oil Supplementation in the Skeletal Muscle of Mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRIGENETICS AND NUTRIGENOMICS
卷 7, 期 4-6, 页码 314-326

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000381777

关键词

Epigenetic modification; Obesity; Omega-3 fatty acids; Pparg2; Liver; Adipose tissue; DNA methyltransferase

资金

  1. governmental agency: Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [2010/07596-8]
  2. governmental agency: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  3. governmental agency: Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: To investigate the global changes in DNA methylation and methylation of the promoter region of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma transcript variant 2 (Pparg2) gene resulting from a high-fat diet (HFD) and/or fish oil supplementation. Methods: Fish oil, rich in omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, or water was orally administered to male mice for 12 weeks. After the first 4 weeks, the animals were fed a control diet or an HFD until the end of the experimental protocol, when the epididymal fat, gastrocnemius muscle and liver were excised. Results: Pparg2 mRNA expression was upregulated by obesity and downregulated by fish oil supplementation in the liver. In the gastrocnemius muscle, diet-induced obesity increased global DNA methylation. Fish oil prevented the decrease in Pparg2 promoter methylation induced by obesity in the gastrocnemius muscle. Regardless of the diet given, fish oil supplementation increased Pparg2 promoter methylation at CpG-263 in muscle and adipose tissue. Conclusion: HFD and fish oil modified global and Pparg2 promoter DNA methylation in a tissue-specific manner. Fish oil supplementation attenuated body weight gain, abolished the increase in Pparg2 expression in the liver and prevented the decrease in Pparg2 promoter methylation in the muscle induced by the HFD. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据