4.6 Article

Chromium deposition and poisoning at La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-delta oxygen electrodes of solid oxide electrolysis cells

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 1601-1609

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4cp05110f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Curtin University Research Fellowships
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21373071, U1134001]
  3. Chinese Scholarship Council
  4. University, State and Commonwealth Governments
  5. Australian Research Council LIEF grant [LE120100026]
  6. Department of Chemistry/Nanochemistry Research Institute, Curtin University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The degradation of solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) is an issue of both scientific and technical importance. In this study, chromium deposition and poisoning at the La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-delta (LSCF) anode or the oxygen electrode of SOECs are studied for the first time under a current density of 200 mA cm(-2) at 900 and 800 degrees C. After polarization in the presence of the Fe-Cr interconnect at 900 degrees C for 20 h, electrode polarization resistance and overpotential of the O-2 evolution reaction (OER) on the LSCF electrode are 0.413 Omega cm(-2) and 127 mV, respectively, which is nearly 7 and 18 times the initial values of the electrode before the polarization. Significant performance degradation was also observed for the reaction at 800 degrees C in the presence of the Fe-Cr alloy. XRD and XPS analyses clearly identified the deposition of SrCrO4, CrO2.5 and Cr2O3 phases on the surface of LSCF oxygen electrodes and their formation is closely related to the increased segregation of the SrO species under anodic polarization conditions. Sr segregation leads to Sr deficiency at the A-site, thus deteriorating the electrocatalytic activity of the LSCF oxygen electrodes for OER. The results indicate that Cr deposition is essentially a chemical reaction and is initiated by the nucleation reaction between the gaseous Cr species and segregated SrO on the surface region of the LSCF oxygen electrode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据