4.7 Article

Activity of P-Glycoprotein, a β-Amyloid Transporter at the Blood-Brain Barrier, Is Compromised in Patients with Mild Alzheimer Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
卷 55, 期 7, 页码 1106-1111

出版社

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.130161

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; blood-brain barrier; P-glycoprotein activity; PET imaging; relative extraction ratio

资金

  1. AHAF [A2007-086]
  2. National Institute of Aging [031485]
  3. NCRR [TL1 RR 025016]
  4. ITHS TL1 Multidisciplinary Predoctoral Clinical Research Training Program [PHS2271]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies in animals and postmortem human brain tissue support a role for P-glycoprotein in clearance of cerebral beta-amyloid across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). We tested the hypothesis that BBB P-glycoprotein activity is diminished in Alzheimer disease (AD) by accounting for an AD-related reduction in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF). Methods: We compared P-glycoprotein activity in mild-AD patients (n = 9) and cognitively normal, age-matched controls (n = 9) using PET with a labeled P-glycoprotein substrate, C-11-verapamil, and O-15-water to measure rCBF. BBB P-glycoprotein activity was expressed as the C-11-verapamil radioactivity extraction ratio (C-11-verapamil brain distributional clearance, K-1/rCBF). Results: Compared with controls, BBB P-glycoprotein activity was significantly lower in the parietotemporal, frontal, and posterior cingulate cortices and hippocampus of mild AD subjects. Conclusion: BBB P-glycoprotein activity in brain regions affected by AD is reduced and is independent of rCBF. This study improves on prior work by eliminating the confounding effect that reduced rCBF has on assessment of BBB P-glycoprotein activity and suggests that impaired P-glycoprotein activity may contribute to cerebral beta-amyloid accumulation in AD. P-glycoprotein induction or activation to increase cerebral beta-amyloid clearance could constitute a novel preventive or therapeutic strategy for AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据