4.6 Article

Diverse mixtures of 2,4-dihydroxy tautomers and O4 protonated conformers of uridine and 2 '-deoxyuridine coexist in the gas phaset

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 17, 期 39, 页码 25978-25988

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5cp02227d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [PIRE-0730072, CHE-1409420]
  2. Wayne State University
  3. WSU C<it>te University
  4. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappeklijk Onderzoek (NWO)
  5. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering [1357887] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The gas-phase conformations of protonated uridine, [Urd+H](+), and its modified form, protonated 2'-deoxyuridine, [dUrd+H](+), generated by electrospray ionization are investigated using infrared multiple photon dissociation (IRMPD) action spectroscopy techniques. IRMPD action spectra of [Urd+H](+) and [dUrd+H](+) are measured over the IR fingerprint and hydrogen-stretching regions. [Urd+H](+) and [dUrd+H](+) exhibit very similar IRMPD spectral profiles. However, the IRMPD yields of [Urd+H](+) exceed those of [dUrd+H](+) in both the IR fingerprint and hydrogen-stretching regions. The measured spectra are compared to the linear IR spectra predicted for the stable low-energy structures of these species computed at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory to determine the tautomeric conformations populated by electrospray ionization. Both B3LYP and MP2 methods find O4 and O2 protonated canonical as well as 2,4-dihydroxy tautomers among the stable low-energy structures of [Urd+H](+) and [dUrd+H](+). Comparison between the measured IRMPD and calculated linear IR spectra suggests that these species exist in their ring-closed forms and that both 2,4-dihydroxy tautomers as well as O4 protonated canonical conformers coexist in the population generated by electrospray ionization for both [Urd+H](+) and [dUrd+H](+). The 2'-deoxy modification of [dUrd+H](+) reduces the variety of 2,4-dihydroxy tautomers populated in the experiments vs. those of [Urd+H](+).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据