4.7 Article

Optoacoustic Imaging of Naphthalocyanine: Potential for Contrast Enhancement and Therapy Monitoring

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 323-328

出版社

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.147157

关键词

naphthalocyanine; photodynamic therapy; optoacoustic; photoacoustic; imaging

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinsaft (DFG) [Sonderforschungsbereich-824 (SFB-824)]
  2. ERC [233161]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [233161] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated in vitro and in vivo the optoacoustic responses of silicon 2,3-naphthalocyanine bi(trihexylsilyloxide) (SiNc), considered herein as a reporter molecule for optoacoustic imaging, elucidating its efficiency for optoacoustic (photoacoustic) signal generation and examining the in vivo performance achieved. Methods: SiNc solutions were prepared using Cremophor EL in water and evaluated for light-absorbing and optoacoustic contrast-generating properties. Photostability and singlet oxygen generation were investigated under pulsed laser illumination and validated using photoabsorbance. HT-29 mouse tumor models were used to assess the biodistribution of the compound and its performance as an optoacoustic contrast agent in vivo. Results: SiNc was found to generate superior optoacoustic signals compared with the commonly used indocyanine green. Multispectral optoacoustic tomography of mouse tumors efficiently resolved the biodistribution of SiNc and the underlying perfusion parameters in vivo. In addition, we demonstrate how light-triggered SiNc reactions with molecular oxygen can be potentially sensed and discuss the relation of these measurements to the biochemical process involved in photothermal treatment. Conclusion: SiNc appears to be a promising family of contrast agent for optoacoustic imaging. Further development possibilities promise to expand its use in purely contrast generation settings, as well as its photodynamic therapy application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据