4.7 Article

Monitoring Afatinib Treatment in HER2-Positive Gastric Cancer with 18F-FDG and 89Zr-Trastuzumab PET

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
卷 54, 期 6, 页码 936-943

出版社

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.110239

关键词

gastric cancer; afatinib; HER2; Zr-89-trastuzumab; F-18-FDG

资金

  1. Geoffrey Beene Cancer Center
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany
  3. Office of Science-U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0002456]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We evaluated the ability of the PET imaging agent Zr-89-trastuzumab to delineate HER2-positive gastric cancer and to monitor the pharmacodynamic effects of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) tyrosine kinase inhibitor afatinib. Methods: Using Zr-89-trastuzumab, F-18-FDG, or 3 '-deoxy-3 '-F-18-fluorothymidine (F-18-FLT PET), we imaged HER2-positive NCI-N87 and HER2-negative MKN74 gastric cancer xenografts in mice. Next, we examined the pharmacodynamic effects of afatinib in NCI-N87 xenografts using Zr-89-trastuzumab and F-18-FDG PET and comparing imaging results to changes in tumor size and in protein expression as monitored by Western blot and histologic studies. Results: Although F-18-FDG uptake in NCI-N87 tumors did not change, a decrease in Zr-89-trastuzumab uptake was observed in the afatinib-treated versus control groups (3.0 +/- 0.0 percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) vs. 21.0 +/- 3.4% ID/g, respectively; P < 0.05). Zr-89-trastuzumab PET results corresponded with tumor reduction, apoptosis, and downregulation of HER2 observed on treatment with afatinib. Downregulation of total HER2, phosphorylated (p)-HER2, and p-EGFR occurred within 24 h of the first dose of afatinib, with a sustained effect over 21 d of treatment. Conclusion: Afatinib demonstrated antitumor activity in HER2-positive gastric cancer in vivo. Zr-89-trastuzumab PET specifically delineated HER2-positive gastric cancer and can be used to measure the pharmacodynamic effects of afatinib.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据