4.7 Article

Measurement of Human Brown Adipose Tissue Volume and Activity Using Anatomic MR Imaging and Functional MR Imaging

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
卷 54, 期 9, 页码 1584-1587

出版社

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.117275

关键词

F-18-FDG; MR imaging; fMRI; cold-activation; brown adipose tissue

资金

  1. NIH [DK087317, DK055545, DK033201, DK081604, DK046200, RR025757, P30 DK036836]
  2. Clinical Translational Science Award from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), Harvard Catalyst [UL1RR025758]
  3. BIDMC from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), Harvard Catalyst
  4. Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (NIH) [UL1 RR 025758]
  5. Harvard University
  6. Eli Lilly Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to assess the volume and function of human brown adipose tissue (BAT) in vivo using MR imaging. Methods: BAT volumes under thermoneutral conditions in the cervical areas were assessed via water-fat contrast using the Dixon method and via water-saturation efficiency using fast spin-echo and T2-weighted images. The existence of cervical BAT was also assessed by F-18-FDG PET/CT scans in the same subjects. BAT functionality was assessed via functional MR imaging (fMRI) blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal changes in response to a mild cold challenge. Results: Under thermoneutral conditions, we were able to distinguish BAT from white adipose tissue in the cervical and supraclavicular fat. BAT showed higher water-to-fat contrast and higher water-saturation efficiency in MR imaging scans. The location and volume of BAT assessed by MR imaging were comparable to the measurements by F-18-FDG PET/CT scans. During mild cold challenge, BOLD fMRI signal increased in BAT by 10.7% +/- 1.8% (P < 0.01). Conclusion: We demonstrated the feasibility of using MR imaging and fMRI to assess BAT volume and BAT responses to mild cold stimulation in the cervical areas of human subjects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据