4.7 Article

Production at the Curie Level of No-Carrier-Added 6-18F-Fluoro-L-Dopa

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
卷 54, 期 7, 页码 1154-1161

出版社

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.112284

关键词

F-18-FDOPA; F-18-fluoride; enantioselective; SPE; phase-transfer catalysis

资金

  1. Universite de Liege
  2. GE grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

6-F-18-fluoro-L-dopa (F-18-FDOPA) has proven to be a useful radiopharmaceutical for the evaluation of presynaptic dopaminergic function using PET. In comparison to electrophilic synthesis, the no-carrier-added (NCA) nucleophilic method has several advantages. These include much higher available activity and specific activity. Recently, we have described an NCA enantioselective synthesis using a chiral phase-transfer catalyst. However, some chemicals were difficult to implement into a commercially available synthesizer, restricting access to this radiopharmaceutical to only a few PET centers. Methods: In this paper, 2 important chemical improvements are proposed to simplify production of F-18-FDOPA, resulting in straightforward automation of the synthesis in a commercially available module. Results: First, a fast, simple, and reliable synthesis of 2-F-18-fluoro-4,5-dimethoxybenzyl iodide on a solid-phase support was developed. Second, a phase-transfer catalyst alkylation of a glycine derivative at room temperature was used to enable enantioselective carbon-carbon bond formation. After hydrolysis and high-performance liquid chromatography purification, a high enantiomeric excess of F-18-FDOPA (similar to 97%) was obtained using a chiral catalyst available from a biphenyl 3 substrate. The total synthesis time was 63 min, and the decay-corrected radiochemical yield was 36% +/- 3% (n = 8). Conclusion: By exploiting the advantages of this NCA approach, using a starting activity of 185 GBq of NCA F-18-fluoride, high activities of F-18-FDOPA (>45 GBq) with high specific activity (>= 753 GBq/mu mol) are now available at the end of synthesis for use in clinical investigations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据