4.7 Article

Microstructural evolution of the 21Cr32Ni model alloy under irradiation

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
卷 510, 期 -, 页码 297-311

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.07.060

关键词

Austenitic stainless steels; Helium; Irradiation; Faulted loop; Cavity; Segregation; Dual beam irradiation; 21Cr32Ni model alloy; 800H

资金

  1. DOE NEUP Integrated Research Project (IRP) by the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-NE0000639]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The microstructural evolution of the 21Cr32Ni model alloy under ion irradiation is investigated. A set of bulk materials were irradiated at the Michigan Ion Beam Laboratory using single beam (5 MeV Fe++) to 1, 10 and 20 dpa at 440 degrees C and dual beam (5 MeV Fe++ plus energy degraded 1.95 MeV He++ ions) to 16.6 dpa at 446 degrees C. The average diameter and number density of the faulted loops and cavities formed under irradiation were characterized using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). The behavior of faulted loop in the model alloy was also investigated in-situ using the Intermediate Voltage Electron Microscope (IVEM) at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). Results show that the average faulted loop diameter decreases, but the faulted loop number density increases with increasing dose. In-situ experiments showed that the faulted loops become unfaulted during ion irradiation by interacting with network dislocations. Although the average faulted loop diameter after 16.6 dpa dual beam irradiation at 446 degrees C was found to be similar to those seen in samples irradiated with single beams to 10 and 20 dpa, the faulted loop number density was significantly higher in the dual beam irradiated sample. Moreover, the dual beam irradiated model alloy exhibits a significantly higher density of smaller cavities. It is also found that the size and density of the faulted loops and voids calculated for the dual beam irradiation of 21Cr32Ni model alloy at 446 degrees C are in better agreement with those measured in a sample neutron irradiated at 375 degrees C. Further discussion is presented in this study. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据