4.7 Article

Spin-lattice dynamics study of vacancy formation and migration in ferromagnetic BCC iron

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
卷 440, 期 1-3, 页码 428-434

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.05.054

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hong Kong Research Grant Commission [534409]
  2. RCUK Energy Programme [EP/I501045]
  3. European Communities
  4. EPSRC [EP/I501045/1, EP/H018921/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H018921/1, EP/I501045/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spin-lattice dynamics (SLD) is performed to study the effect of ferromagnetism on vacancy formation and migration in BCC iron. Using a modified thermodynamic integration (TI) method, energies and entropies of mono-vacancy formation and migration are calculated from the SLD and MD phase-space trajectories. By comparing results among ferromagnetic, paramagnetic and non-magnetic cases, our analysis suggests that ferromagnetism significantly affects vacancy formation and migration in two ways. Firstly, scattering of magnons by the vacancy as a lattice imperfection results in an increase of the total free energy of the crystal, which depends on the vacancy configuration (equilibrium and saddle-point), and which thus contributes to vacancy formation and migration. Secondly, through the Heisenberg Hamiltonian, interatomic forces due to the exchange interaction of the electrons of neighboring atoms depend on the magnon state. The strong temperature dependence of the magnon distribution, particularly across the magnetic phase boundary, is carried through to all lattice properties, including the atomic volume, phonon frequency and lifetime, defect configurations and properties, giving rise to the observed non-Arrhenius behaviors of vacancy formation, migration, and self-diffusion. Our results are in good general agreement with experimental data, an exception being the migration energy derived from stage III recovery. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据