4.7 Article

Deuterium retention in tungsten at fluences of up to 10(26) D+/m(2) using D+ ion beams

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
卷 399, 期 1, 页码 101-107

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.01.007

关键词

T1000, Tungsten; H0400, Hydrogen; I0400, Ion irradiation; R0100, Radiation effects

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deuterium retention in two types of polycrystalline tungsten (PCW) was studied as a function of incident ion fluence, ion energy, and specimen temperature. (i) D retention at 300 K, as a function of D. fluence, demonstrated a trend to saturation in both the Rembar hot-rolled thin foil and Plansee tungsten plate. At 500 K, new D retention results for the Plansee PCW showed an increasing trend with increasing incident fluence without any indication of saturation, in agreement with previous results for Rembar PCW [A.A. Haasz, J.W. Davis, M. Poon, R.G. Macaulay-Newcombe, J. Nucl. Mater. 258-263 (1998) 889-895]. Even when the incident D+ fluence was increased to 8 x 10(25) D+/m(2), which is in the fluence range of plasma devices, there was still no sign of saturation. (ii) The temperature dependence results for the Plansee PCW show a decreasing trend in D retention as the temperature is increased from 300 to 500 K. These results differ from previous studies of Rembar PCW [A.A. Haasz, J.W. Davis, M. Poon, R.G. Macaulay-Newcombe, J. Nucl. Mater. 258-263 (1998) 889-895], but are similar to those seen for single crystal tungsten [M. Poon, A.A. Haasz, J.W. Davis, R.G. Macaulay-Newcombe, J. Nucl. Mater. 313-316 (2003) 199]; an explanation for the different behaviour is suggested. (iii) Varying the D+ energy from 100 to 500 eV/D+ plays a minor role in the amount of D retained, suggesting that D retention in W depends more on the W structure, incident ion fluence and specimen temperature, rather than on the incident ion energy when the energy is below the threshold for damage formation (similar to 960 eV for D on W). (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据