4.6 Article

On the non-classical contribution in lone-pair-π interaction: IQA perspective

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 17, 期 39, 页码 26183-26190

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5cp04489h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [14-14654S]
  2. European Regional Development Fund [CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0068]
  3. MetaCentrum [LM2010005]
  4. Operational Program Research and Development for Innovations [CZ.1.05/3.2.00/08.0144]
  5. SoMoPro II Programme - European Union
  6. SoMoPro II Programme - South-Moravian Region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work the nature of lone-pair-pi interactions between water molecules and a number of p-rings with different substituents/hetero-atoms in the light of quantum chemical topology approaches is studied. The Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules (QTAIM) and Interacting Quantum Atoms (IQA) were employed for distinguishing the role of heteroatoms and electron withdrawing substituents in the complex formation between water and p-rings. Our IQA study identified three classes of water-pi complexes on the basis of the relative role of electrostatics (classical) and exchange-correlation (non-classical) factors in the interaction energy between the oxygen of water (the lone-pair donor) and the sp(2) atoms of the p-ring, i.e. the primary lp-pi interaction. Considering both the primary and secondary (the rest of interatomic interactions except O-water-pi-ring atoms) interactions demonstrates that the exchange-correlation is the dominant contributor to the binding energy. This proves a non-negligible contribution of non-classical factors in the stabilization of the lone-pair-pi complexes. However, in spite of a relatively large contribution of the exchange-correlation, this part of the interaction energy is virtually counterbalanced by the deformation energy, i.e. the increase in atomic kinetic energy upon complexation. This finding clarifies why water-pi interactions can be modelled by simple electrostatics without the need to invoke quantum effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据